Assets of subsidiary company cannot be dealt with in CIRP of a holding company : Observed NCLAT, Delhi

MOU terminating the main agreement containing the arbitration clause can be referred to arbitration: Observes Delhi High Court

The Delhi High Court in the matter of Super Blastech Solutions vs. Rajasthan Explosives and Chemicals Limited observed that a dispute arising out of an Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) or Memorandum of Settlement (MoS), wherein no arbitration clause is present, can be referred to arbitration if these agreements were directly linked to the main agreement. The Delhi […]

Invoking CIRP would not make the dispute non-arbitrable : Observes Delhi High Court

The Delhi High Court in the matter Brilltech Engineers Pvt. Ltd. v. Shapoorji Pallonji and Co. Pvt Ltd has held that the dispute would not become non-arbitrable merely because the Petitioner, before filing the application for appointment of arbitrator, has filed a corporate insolvency application under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (“IBC”). The […]

Operational Creditor cannot change the ‘date of default’ by confining the invoices to a later period: Reiterates NCLT, Mumbai

The National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), Mumbai Bench, on October 19, 2022 while adjudicating a petition filed in M/s Shri Sadguru Traders v. M/s Gajalee Coastal Foods Pvt. Ltd., reiterated that the Operational Creditor cannot change the ‘date of default’ by confining the invoices to a later period. In the instant matter, M/s Shri Sadguru Traders (“Operational Creditor”), […]

Cookie Consent with Real Cookie Banner