The interest or claim of a partner against another partner or firm is not protected under IBC: NCLT Mumbai

SARFAESI proceedings cannot be continued against corporate debtor once CIRP is admitted and moratorium is ordered: Observes Supreme Court

The Supreme Court on May 18, 2022 in the case of Indian Overseas Bank v. RCM Infrastructure Ltd observed that the proceedings under the SARFAESI Act cannot be continued once the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (“CIRP”) is initiated and the moratorium is ordered. In this case, the Indian Overseas Bank (“the Bank”) had extended certain credit facilities […]

Section 18 Limitation Act Is Applicable To IBC Proceedings: Reiterates Supreme Court

The Supreme Court on May 18, 2022 in the case of State Bank of India v. Krishidhan Seeds Private Limited observed that the provisions of Section 18 of the Limitation Act are applicable to proceedings under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (“IBC”). In the instant case, the NCLT rejected the application filed by the State Bank […]

Committee of Creditors is competent to revise the approved fees of Resolution Professional– Observes NCLAT

National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (“NCLAT”) on May 08, 2022 in the matter of Kushwinder Singhal v. Reena Tiwari held that the Committee of Creditors (“CoC”) is fully competent to revise its earlier approved fees of the Resolution Professional (“RP”). In the instant case, after the initiation of the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (“CIRP”) of Bestways Transport India Pvt Ltd. (“Bestways”), COC decided the fees […]

Cookie Consent with Real Cookie Banner